Table of Contents
Defend dissent! — FAN 331
Marina Ovsyannikova's anti-war protest during a Russian state television network's live broadcast.
FAN is on spring break and will return next week. In the meantime, here is the full “Academic Speech — Protected or Perilous?” series:
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “ACLU’s David Cole Weighs in on Georgetown University Law School Controversy. Commentaries to Follow”
- Erwin Chemerinsky, “The Role of Deans and Administrators in Dealing with Offensive Speech”
- Nadine Strossen, “Some Thoughts About University Officials’ ‘Counter-Speech’”
- Burt Neuborne, “Sticks and Stones”
- Ira Glasser, “Social Justice Requires Free Speech”
- John K. Wilson, “How Suspensions Violate Academic Freedom”
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “Georgetown’s Free Speech Experiment: What’s Next?”
- Emerson Sykes, "Academic Freedom for Whom?”
Related
- Nate Hochman, "Full Video Shows Law Students Heckling, Shouting Down Ilya Shapiro for 45 Minutes,” National Review (March 2)
Last scheduled FAN
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
The fight for privacy and free speech in the surveillance age
Podcast
The early internet opened unprecedented avenues for
speech, creativity, and connection without traditional
gatekeepers...
University of North Texas cancels art show — then power-washes protests
UNT canceled an artist’s exhibit, then scrubbed student protests against its actions.
California lawmakers threaten free speech regarding immigration groups
A new California bill aims to fights threats to immigrants, but a sweeping rule on posting “personal info” could chill lawful speech.
The critics are wrong about Tennessee’s Charlie Kirk Act. Here’s why.
Tennessee’s Charlie Kirk Act strengthens campus free speech, protecting faculty, students and speakers from censorship and retaliation.