Table of Contents
Defend dissent! — FAN 331
Marina Ovsyannikova's anti-war protest during a Russian state television network's live broadcast.
FAN is on spring break and will return next week. In the meantime, here is the full “Academic Speech — Protected or Perilous?” series:
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “ACLU’s David Cole Weighs in on Georgetown University Law School Controversy. Commentaries to Follow”
- Erwin Chemerinsky, “The Role of Deans and Administrators in Dealing with Offensive Speech”
- Nadine Strossen, “Some Thoughts About University Officials’ ‘Counter-Speech’”
- Burt Neuborne, “Sticks and Stones”
- Ira Glasser, “Social Justice Requires Free Speech”
- John K. Wilson, “How Suspensions Violate Academic Freedom”
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “Georgetown’s Free Speech Experiment: What’s Next?”
- Emerson Sykes, "Academic Freedom for Whom?”
Related
- Nate Hochman, "Full Video Shows Law Students Heckling, Shouting Down Ilya Shapiro for 45 Minutes,” National Review (March 2)
Last scheduled FAN
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Are AI companies doing authoritarians’ dirty work?
Are AI companies exporting authoritarian censorship worldwide? A new report warns that repressive regimes may be shaping what LLMs will say.
Can the government require ID before you use artificial intelligence?
Age checks for AI could become ID checks, threatening privacy, anonymity, and the freedom to ask questions, learn, and explore ideas online.
The crusade to ban teens from social media is advancing across Europe
Europe joins the push to ban teens from social media as the UK expands censorship efforts and free speech comes under pressure worldwide.
When AI mirrors foreign censorship: FIRE statement on Oversight Board AI speech report
New research from the Oversight Board reveals a troubling trend: Leading AI models will manipulate and censor their outputs to avoid criticizing or mocking dictators and repressive regimes.