Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRE Legal Network attorney Robert Corry, who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has joined The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to write to Stanford’s president threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Minecraft, censorship, and threats to press freedom with Clayton Weimers
Podcast
Editorial note: This conversation was recorded on
Friday, April 24, the day before the White House Correspondents'
Dinner...
Licensed to speak? How NY’s AI bill gets it wrong.
New York’s AI bill could treat everyday chatbot answers as unlicensed advice, blurring speech and conduct while chilling access to information.
A lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter activist could chill all of our speech
A lawsuit against a BLM organizer could hold protest leaders liable for others’ violence, threatening to chill free speech and assembly rights.
Yale tries to claw back public trust
Yale recently released a committee report outlining ways the school can improve, including on free speech.