Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRE Legal Network attorney Robert Corry, who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has joined The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to write to Stanford’s president threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Victory! High school clears publication of stalled student articles after FIRE’s intervention
After FIRE intervenes, a Florida high school lifts its block on student articles critical of the school board — AI excuses and all.
NY attorney general threatens to remove school board members over trans comments
NY AG Letitia James warned school boards to censor “demeaning” speech on trans issues or face removal, prompting a First Amendment lawsuit.
FIRE statement on the University of Texas System Board of Regents adopting guidelines for ‘controversial’ topics in class
The University of Texas System’s Board of Regents approved new rules governing how faculty members can and cannot teach about “controversial” topics.
Bad cop
Brendan Carr’s bid to weaponize the FCC’s equal-time rule against late-night TV shows shows why regulators can’t be trusted with speech.