Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRE Legal Network attorney Robert Corry, who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has joined The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to write to Stanford’s president threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Legendary lawyer Michael Tigar on juries, free speech, and the trial of John Peter Zenger
Podcast
Long before the First Amendment, John Peter Zenger
stood trial for publishing criticisms of New York's then colonial
governor...
The real threat at Michigan’s commencement wasn’t the speech
A Michigan professor’s commencement remarks deserved debate — not demands that the university punish him for expressing an unpopular view.
How does the First Amendment govern liability for AI?
Lawsuits blame chatbots for medical harm, suicide, and violence. The First Amendment may turn on whether AI is speaking or acting in the real world.
Investigated for saying 'word salad'!?
Hofstra is probing a professor for calling a course proposal “word salad.” Tell the university to drop this speech-chilling investigation now.