Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRE Legal Network attorney Robert Corry, who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has joined The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to write to Stanford’s president threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Ada Palmer on the history of censorship from the Renaissance to AI
Podcast
Censorship is often associated with authoritarian
governments...
Can the government require ID before you use artificial intelligence?
Age checks for AI could become ID checks, threatening privacy, anonymity, and the freedom to ask questions, learn, and explore ideas online.
The crusade to ban teens from social media is advancing across Europe
Europe joins the push to ban teens from social media as the UK expands censorship efforts and free speech comes under pressure worldwide.
When AI mirrors foreign censorship: FIRE statement on Oversight Board AI speech report
New research from the Oversight Board reveals a troubling trend: Leading AI models will manipulate and censor their outputs to avoid criticizing or mocking dictators and repressive regimes.