Table of Contents
FIRE statement on White House denying AP Oval Office access
T. Schneider / Shutterstock.com
Punishing journalists for not adopting state-mandated terminology is an alarming attack on press freedom. That's viewpoint discrimination, and it's unconstitutional.
President Trump has the authority to change how the U.S. government refers to the Gulf. But he cannot punish a news organization for using another term. The role of our free press is to hold those in power accountable, not to act as their mouthpiece. Any government efforts to erode this fundamental freedom deserve condemnation.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
New Mexico's $25 billion verdict against Meta is fundamentally about speech
New Mexico won $25 billion from Meta. But much of the case was about speech, not privacy, and it hands states a blueprint to police moderation.
Silencing social media won't stop the unrest in France
French politicians want to shut down social media during riots. But censorship won't stop unrest, though it could make things worse.
FIRE is bringing the Free Speech Forum to the West Coast!
Can you defend speech you disagree with? Find out at FIRE and Stanford’s free Free Speech Forum for high school juniors and seniors.
After a congressman challenged a student reporter’s right to record, here’s what journalists should know
Recording conversations in public isn’t surreptitious or against the law — and knowing how to assert your right to record can make your reporting easier