Table of Contents
FIRE statement on White House denying AP Oval Office access
T. Schneider / Shutterstock.com
Punishing journalists for not adopting state-mandated terminology is an alarming attack on press freedom. That's viewpoint discrimination, and it's unconstitutional.
President Trump has the authority to change how the U.S. government refers to the Gulf. But he cannot punish a news organization for using another term. The role of our free press is to hold those in power accountable, not to act as their mouthpiece. Any government efforts to erode this fundamental freedom deserve condemnation.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
FIRE demands LA City Council end policy banning certain words during public comment
The Constitution forbids the government from banning words. But the Los Angeles City Council doesn’t seem to understand.
Shiloh Hendrix’s conviction can’t be squared with the First Amendment
However much offense words cause, that does not justify the government imprisoning, fining, or otherwise punishing the speaker.
Is training AI on copyrighted materials protected by the First Amendment?
A wave of lawsuits risks giving copyright holders a veto over a transformative new medium of expression.
Pennsylvania shields public universities from transparency. This student wants to change that.
When former University of Pittsburgh student and freelance journalist Henry Bard tried to get records from his campus police department last year, the university swiftly said no.