Table of Contents
Article Highlights Partisanship of Campus Speech Codes
Former FIRE president David French has an article on speech codes on National Review Online today. He explains the “mental agility” of the 1960s free speech activists who have become the architects of today’s campus speech codes. David writes:
Those who formerly glorified dissent clamp down on campus with a mind-numbing level of intellectual conformity. Scientific inquiry is welcome, unless it results in tough questions about possible innate gender differences. Open debate is the hallmark of the academy, unless of course that debate intrudes into areas where policy should be settled and morality decided (like when dealing with race, class, gender, war, peace, and sexuality).
FIRE exists to counteract this suppression of dissent and to “defend and sustain individual rights on America’s increasingly repressive and partisan colleges and universities.” From College Republicans holding affirmative action bake sales to PETA groups tabling the campus quad, we will protect everyone’s freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, and due process rights no matter where they land on the political spectrum.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Victory! High school clears publication of stalled student articles after FIRE’s intervention
After FIRE intervenes, a Florida high school lifts its block on student articles critical of the school board — AI excuses and all.
NY attorney general threatens to remove school board members over trans comments
NY AG Letitia James warned school boards to censor “demeaning” speech on trans issues or face removal, prompting a First Amendment lawsuit.
FIRE statement on the University of Texas System Board of Regents adopting guidelines for ‘controversial’ topics in class
The University of Texas System’s Board of Regents approved new rules governing how faculty members can and cannot teach about “controversial” topics.
Bad cop
Brendan Carr’s bid to weaponize the FCC’s equal-time rule against late-night TV shows shows why regulators can’t be trusted with speech.