Table of Contents
Sliding Down the Slippery Facebook.com Slope
This morning, I nearly choked on my coffee when I read a story in The Daily Collegian that discussed a demand from the NCAA and PSU to a student to shutdown a Facebook.com group that advocated for a prospective student athlete to attend Penn State. According to the article, the student creator of the group, John Bove, received an email from the PSU NCAA Compliance Coordinator that demanded the group be shut down immediately because it could be perceived as violating recruiting regulations.
It is beyond me how private speech by a student, who does not appear to be connected in any official way to the recruiting process, can somehow be construed to violate NCAA recruiting regulations. Effectively, this action means that universities are policing Facebook.com and other social networking sites to avoid violating athletic recruiting regulations. If universities choose to monitor social networking sites for this reason, what is to stop them from expanding the scope of this monitoring program? What is next—regulating groups which the university perceives as offensive or that hold ideas or values that run counter to university orthodoxy?
To some this may seem far-fetched, but unfortunately actions such as this are becoming more commonplace. FIRE has been forced to intervene in many cases to protect the online free speech rights of students and faculty. In one case at the University of Central Florida, a student was brought up on charges for creating a Facebook.com group which called a fellow student government candidate “a jerk and a fool.” In another incident, Johns Hopkins University severely disciplined a student who posted an offensive Halloween party invitation on a Facebook.com group.
One thing is for sure, if actions such as this continue, it will only result in more controversy. Stay tuned for further developments as FIRE looks into this apparently burgeoning trend.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Your speech, their rules: How foreign governments censor Americans
From arrests to online censorship, foreign governments are increasingly targeting Americans for speech protected by the First Amendment at home.
New Mexico's $25 billion verdict against Meta is fundamentally about speech
New Mexico won $25 billion from Meta. But much of the case was about speech, not privacy, and it hands states a blueprint to police moderation.
Silencing social media won't stop the unrest in France
French politicians want to shut down social media during riots. But censorship won't stop unrest, though it could make things worse.
FIRE is bringing the Free Speech Forum to the West Coast!
Can you defend speech you disagree with? Find out at FIRE and Stanford’s free Free Speech Forum for high school juniors and seniors.