Table of Contents
The Good, the Bad, and the Just Plain Silly
As a free speech organization, we see pretty much every type of censorship out there. People are frequently censored at colleges and universities for engaging in controversial political speech. Other times, people are censored for engaging in speech that is crude and repugnant, but that is wholly protected. And then there are times that people seem to be censored for no reason at all. Today’s case at Marquette University is one of those instances. In the spirit of levity, here are a few more of the silliest instances of censorship we’ve seen here at FIRE:
- Gonzaga University tried to punish students for engaging in “hate speech” for posting a flyer advertising a speech by the author of the book Why the Left Hates America. Gonzaga administrators reasoned that because the flyer contained the word “hate,” it constituted “hate speech.”
- The University of New Hampshire charged a student with “harassment” and “disorderly conduct” for posting a flyer in his dorm elevators joking that women who want to lose the ‘Freshman 15’ should take the stairs instead of the elevator. The flyer was merely intended to make light of the student’s frustration with people who delay the elevator by taking it for just one or two floors instead of taking the stairs.
- The University of Central Florida attempted to punish a student for calling a student government candidate a “jerk and a fool” on the popular college website Facebook.com.
- Indian River Community College banned a student group from showing The Passion of the Christ because it was rated R, while at the same time allowing the performance of a skit entitled “F*cking for Jesus.”
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
BREAKING: Federal court rules the statutes the Trump admin used in its speech-based deportation scheme are unconstitutional
A federal court ruled that the provisions Secretary of State Marco Rubio used in an attempt to deport legal immigrants for their speech are unconstitutional.
That $17B Meta settlement comes with a catch: Your online speech rights
The lawsuits, which accused the company of harming young people through the design of their speech platforms, relied on untested legal theories that faced serious First Amendment challenges.
Is Britain bringing blasphemy laws back under another name?
Britain abolished blasphemy law years ago. A Quran burning, an anti-Islam meme, and two protest signs show why the controversy never left.
The U.S. military is at war with its own newspaper
The Pentagon fired Stars and Stripes leaders after they defended editorial independence, raising alarms over military control of its own press.