Table of Contents
Illinois Retires Chief Illiniwek
The New York Times and the Illinois student newspaper the Daily Illini both report today that the University of Illinois is retiring its Native American mascot, Chief Illiniwek, on February 21, after the last men’s home basketball game of the season.
The NCAA Executive Committee instituted a policy in 2005 that placed Illinois on a list of non-compliant institutions for maintaining the Native American mascot. Illinois was thus banned from hosting NCAA post-season events at home.
Lawrence C. Eppley, the Chair of Illinois’ Board of Trustees, explained the decision to retire the Chief in a university press release issued this morning:
U. of I. Board of Trustees Chair Lawrence C. Eppley said today’s announcement marks a critical step toward finishing the work of the consensus process. “This step is in the best interest of the University and is consistent with the Board’s previously stated goal of concluding this year its consensus process regarding Chief Illiniwek. Among our objectives was recognizing the goal of having high integrity athletic programs and student athletes who have the opportunity to compete at the highest levels,” Eppley said.
The debate over the Chief Illiniwek mascot was a hotly contested issue on Illinois’ campus; as FIRE announced just yesterday, approximately 130 Illinois students joined a Facebook.com group called “If They Get Rid of the Chief I’m Becoming a Racist.” One student posted a comment on the group’s wall deriding the advocates for the Chief’s removal, stating, “apparently the leader of this movement is of Sioux descent … the Sioux are the ones that killed off the Illini [I]ndians, so she’s just trying to finish what her ancestors started. I say we throw a tomohawk [sic] into her face.”
Faculty and staff urged the university to take action against that student, and Illinois Chancellor Richard Herman said publicly that he would press for disciplinary action against the student for making threats online. As FIRE has stated, the tomahawk comment does not meet the level of a “true threat,” but is rather fully protected hyperbolic expression.
Along with the Chief, I wonder if Herman will also retire his promise of disciplinary action against the student online commenter.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Why you should talk to strangers w/ Fin Colleton and Kratima Divakar
Podcast
Growing up, most of us learned one simple rule: don't talk to strangers...
After a congressman challenged a student reporter’s right to record, here’s what journalists should know
Recording conversations in public isn’t surreptitious or against the law — and knowing how to assert your right to record can make your reporting easier
Restoring Title IX kangaroo courts is no solution to the ‘Cornell 7’ sexual assault controversy
The outrage over the sexual assault allegations at Cornell University cannot lead to a return to the old Title IX regulations that cast aside due process.
A UK teen mocked a local politician. Then the police showed up.
The question now won’t just be whether police will come knocking at your door over what you said online, but under what conditions you can speak online in the first place.