JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. WILSON, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION OF NEW YORK, et al.

Can public officials block users on social media accounts they use for official business? In most cases the answer is no, but there are some exceptions.

Does the Progress Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain?

Did the FCC violate the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by changing its policy to regulate fleeting expletives without providing a reasoned explanation for the change?

Whether the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) induces public libraries to violate the First Amendment.

Is the Communications Decency Act of 1996 the least restrictive means to block cable television channels primarily broadcasting sexually oriented programming, such that it does not violate the First Amendment?

Whether a federal law banning truthful, non-misleading broadcast ads of private casino gaming violates commercial free-speech rights.

Whether the provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that prohibit the transmission of indecent and patently offensive materials to minors over the Internet violate the First Amendment.

Whether the government may constitutionally require cable television system operators to carry local broadcast stations.

Whether specific provisions of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 violated the First Amendment rights of cable programmers, viewers, and operators.

Whether the government may constitutionally require cable television system operators to carry local broadcast stations.

Whether a federal statute that completely banned both indecent and obscene interstate commercial telephone messages ("dial-a-porn") violated the First Amendment by suppressing protected speech for adults.

Whether Section 399 of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, as amended by the Public Broadcasting Amendments Act of 1981, which forbids any "non-commercial educational broadcasting station which receives a grant from the Corporation" to "engage in editorializing," violate the First Amendment.

Whether a broadcast of patently offensive words dealing with sex and excretion may be regulated because of its content.

Whether FCC rules requiring broadcasters to provide reply time to individuals subjected to personal attacks or political editorials on the air violates the freedom of speech and press guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Does a Maryland law that requires that all films be submitted to a board of censors before being exhibited violate the First Amendment?

Whether the conviction of a manager of a movie theater for "possessing and exhibiting an allegedly obscene film" violated the free speech guarantee of the First Amendment.

Whether a Chicago ordinance requiring submission of films for examination by city officials as prerequisite to granting of permit for public exhibition of such films violates the First Amendment.

Whether a New York law denying licenses to show movies which "alluringly portrays adultery as proper behavior" is viewpont discrimination and violates the First Amendment.

Whether an Ohio statute forbidding the commercial showing of any motion picture film without a license constitutes a prior restraint and is unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

Whether the operation of a radio service broadcasting music, commercials and announcements on public buses violates the freedoms of speech and privacy guaranteed to citizens by the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.

Do the constitutional protections of freedom of expression, including those of the Ohio Constitution, extend to motion pictures?