DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Can public officials block users on social media accounts they use for official business? In most cases the answer is no, but there are some exceptions.

Did the FCC violate the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by changing its policy to regulate fleeting expletives without providing a reasoned explanation for the change?

Whether the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) induces public libraries to violate the First Amendment.

Is the Communications Decency Act of 1996 the least restrictive means to block cable television channels primarily broadcasting sexually oriented programming, such that it does not violate the First Amendment?

Whether a federal law banning truthful, non-misleading broadcast ads of private casino gaming violates commercial free-speech rights.

Whether the provisions of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that prohibit the transmission of indecent and patently offensive materials to minors over the Internet violate the First Amendment.

Whether the government may constitutionally require cable television system operators to carry local broadcast stations.

Whether the government may constitutionally require cable television system operators to carry local broadcast stations.

Whether a federal statute that completely banned both indecent and obscene interstate commercial telephone messages ("dial-a-porn") violated the First Amendment by suppressing protected speech for adults.

Whether Section 399 of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, as amended by the Public Broadcasting Amendments Act of 1981, which forbids any "non-commercial educational broadcasting station which receives a grant from the Corporation" to "engage in editorializing," violate the First Amendment.

Whether a broadcast of patently offensive words dealing with sex and excretion may be regulated because of its content.

Whether arresting someone for wearing a jacket that says “Fuck the Draft” under a California statute which prohibits “offensive conduct” violated the First Amendment.

Whether a New York Education Law that prohibited the commercial showing of any motion picture film without a license, and authorized denial of a license on a censors conclusion that a film was "sacrilegious," violated the First Amendment. Could the New York Board of Regents ban Roberto Rossellinis The Miracle under regulations barring "sacrilegious" films?

Whether the operation of a radio service broadcasting music, commercials and announcements on public buses violates the freedoms of speech and privacy guaranteed to citizens by the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.

Do the constitutional protections of freedom of expression, including those of the Ohio Constitution, extend to motion pictures?