Table of Contents
Student-Athletes May Face Increased Online Community Restrictions
Athletic directors and coaches are the latest group to express concern with online communities like Facebook.com and MySpace.com. At the end of June, Laing Kennedy, the Athletic Director at Kent State University, announced that student athletes must remove their Facebook profiles by August 1. A recent article from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which discusses this trend, explains that “Kennedy, who received harsh criticism, quickly backed off his ban and said last week he now restricts and monitors athletes’ use of the site.”
The monitoring and restriction of student-athletes’ profiles is more complicated than the same actions involving non-athletes. ADs and coaches seem most concerned about the images of the school, the athletic department, and the teams that these profiles can portray. The Columbus Dispatch reports that when discussing his proposed ban on student-athlete Facebook profiles, Kennedy said, “Student-athletes are representative of the university…and anything embarrassing on a student’s profile can be embarrassing for the university as well.”
As FIRE President Greg Lukianoff states in the Journal-Constitution article:
We have always recognized that students can give up certain rights to play athletics in college… They are representatives of the college. So we do recognize that universities have increased power to place limitations on students who are athletes.[…]Do you have to give up all your expressive rights to be on the sports team? By monitoring or censoring these sites, [college athletic programs] seem to be ignoring that these are both athletes and students.
Instead of banning these online communities, ADs and coaches should educate student-athletes on the consequences of their choices.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Why is the Chinese government dictating who speaks at a religious event in Texas?
Chinese officials pressured a U.S. Catholic group to drop a Texas conference speaker. What the episode reveals about censorship on American soil.
This federal case against Minnesota protesters is worth watching if you care about your civil liberties
The tentacles of the Trump administration’s domestic spying apparatus are being revealed — and their reach is alarming.
Federal court rules the statutes the Trump admin used in its speech-based deportation scheme are unconstitutional
A federal court ruled that the provisions Secretary of State Marco Rubio used in an attempt to deport legal immigrants for their speech are unconstitutional.
That $17B Meta settlement comes with a catch: Your online speech rights
The lawsuits, which accused the company of harming young people through the design of their speech platforms, relied on untested legal theories that faced serious First Amendment challenges.