Table of Contents
‘Reason’ Riffs on ‘Hot for Teacher’ Case
Jacob Sullum of Reason's blog Hit & Run takes on the case of Joseph Corlett at Oakland University in an entry titled "When is Quoting Van Halen a Crime?" Sullum provides a rundown of the case, including the fact that Corlett's views on concealed carry on campus were used as evidence against him. Sullum notes, "It's pretty clear that Corlett's journal entries did not amount to sexual harassment. Are they nevertheless a kind of disruptive speech that universities should punish?" He also asks, "[W]hat, if anything, do his views on gun control have to do with it?" An excellent question—and one Oakland has yet to answer.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Legendary lawyer Michael Tigar on juries, free speech, and the trial of John Peter Zenger
Podcast
Long before the First Amendment, John Peter Zenger
stood trial for publishing criticisms of New York's then colonial
governor...
Universities' double failure on antisemitism and free speech
Title VI requires colleges to confront antisemitic harassment — not censor political speech
The real threat at Michigan’s commencement wasn’t the speech
A Michigan professor’s commencement remarks deserved debate — not demands that the university punish him for expressing an unpopular view.
How does the First Amendment govern liability for AI?
Lawsuits blame chatbots for medical harm, suicide, and violence. The First Amendment may turn on whether AI is speaking or acting in the real world.