Table of Contents
‘Reason’ Riffs on ‘Hot for Teacher’ Case
Jacob Sullum of Reason's blog Hit & Run takes on the case of Joseph Corlett at Oakland University in an entry titled "When is Quoting Van Halen a Crime?" Sullum provides a rundown of the case, including the fact that Corlett's views on concealed carry on campus were used as evidence against him. Sullum notes, "It's pretty clear that Corlett's journal entries did not amount to sexual harassment. Are they nevertheless a kind of disruptive speech that universities should punish?" He also asks, "[W]hat, if anything, do his views on gun control have to do with it?" An excellent question—and one Oakland has yet to answer.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Ada Palmer on the history of censorship from the Renaissance to AI
Podcast
Censorship is often associated with authoritarian
governments...
The crusade to ban teens from social media is advancing across Europe
Europe joins the push to ban teens from social media as the UK expands censorship efforts and free speech comes under pressure worldwide.
When AI mirrors foreign censorship: FIRE statement on Oversight Board AI speech report
New research from the Oversight Board reveals a troubling trend: Leading AI models will manipulate and censor their outputs to avoid criticizing or mocking dictators and repressive regimes.
After punishing people for Charlie Kirk comments, colleges are paying steep settlements
Public institutions are paying dearly for punishing Charlie Kirk speech. The First Amendment protects unpopular views — and lawsuits prove it.