Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Victory! High school clears publication of stalled student articles after FIRE’s intervention
After FIRE intervenes, a Florida high school lifts its block on student articles critical of the school board — AI excuses and all.
NY attorney general threatens to remove school board members over trans comments
NY AG Letitia James warned school boards to censor “demeaning” speech on trans issues or face removal, prompting a First Amendment lawsuit.
FIRE statement on the University of Texas System Board of Regents adopting guidelines for ‘controversial’ topics in class
The University of Texas System’s Board of Regents approved new rules governing how faculty members can and cannot teach about “controversial” topics.
Bad cop
Brendan Carr’s bid to weaponize the FCC’s equal-time rule against late-night TV shows shows why regulators can’t be trusted with speech.