Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
New Mexico's $25 billion verdict against Meta is fundamentally about speech
New Mexico won $25 billion from Meta. But much of the case was about speech, not privacy, and it hands states a blueprint to police moderation.
Silencing social media won't stop the unrest in France
French politicians want to shut down social media during riots. But censorship won't stop unrest, though it could make things worse.
FIRE is bringing the Free Speech Forum to the West Coast!
Can you defend speech you disagree with? Find out at FIRE and Stanford’s free Free Speech Forum for high school juniors and seniors.
After a congressman challenged a student reporter’s right to record, here’s what journalists should know
Recording conversations in public isn’t surreptitious or against the law — and knowing how to assert your right to record can make your reporting easier