Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
FIRE endorses Senate bill that would prevent government coercion of protected speech
FIRE supports a bipartisan bill that would prevent the federal government from strong-arming private parties into censoring protected expression.
Illinois' doomed plan to tax social media
Illinois can tax income — not speech. Its new social media fee targets platforms for user content, inviting a First Amendment fight.
Auburn’s governing overhaul guts accountability
Auburn’s trustees just sidelined faculty governance and claimed sweeping authority over academics, weakening oversight and accountability.
FIRE backs JAWBONE Act to end backdoor censorship
FIRE backs the bipartisan JAWBONE Act to curb government jawboning, boost transparency, and protect free speech online.