Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Prosecuting Michel Houellebecq will not make France safer, but it will be less free
Houellebecq is facing a judge-led investigation for "incitement to discrimination" for comments he made in a 2022 magazine interview.
UK police arrest hundreds more peaceful protesters under anti-terror law
UK police arrest hundreds more peaceful protesters under anti-terror laws, while a Georgian journalist is jailed again for mocking politicians.
When America knew what it was defending
The Nazis burned books while America printed 122 million paperbacks for its troops. Here's what wartime posters can teach us about moral clarity and free expression.
At Haverford, heated topics shouldn't chill speech
October was a heated month for expression at Haverford — but incidents on campus shouldn’t chill student expression.