Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from FIRE.
Why is the Chinese government dictating who speaks at a religious event in Texas?
Chinese officials pressured a U.S. Catholic group to drop a Texas conference speaker. What the episode reveals about censorship on American soil.
This federal case against Minnesota protesters is worth watching if you care about your civil liberties
The tentacles of the Trump administration’s domestic spying apparatus are being revealed — and their reach is alarming.
Federal court rules the statutes the Trump admin used in its speech-based deportation scheme are unconstitutional
A federal court ruled that the provisions Secretary of State Marco Rubio used in an attempt to deport legal immigrants for their speech are unconstitutional.
That $17B Meta settlement comes with a catch: Your online speech rights
The lawsuits, which accused the company of harming young people through the design of their speech platforms, relied on untested legal theories that faced serious First Amendment challenges.